![]() Which further neatens things - particularly when click () īy using the annotation, when the page loads you’d automatically waitįor the button to be visible. at the top of your class ( css = "#search_button" ) private WebElement button // when you want to use it button. To update your project to use the latest simply find and update the lines in your pom.xml file: You do not need to clone/edit/touch it - unless you want to help improve it by submitting a pull request! Give an idea of how to structure new tests.įrameworkium-core] core is a separate project, which contains (and tucks away)Īll of the code that helps to simplify and keep tidy your tests. It comes with example tests for both web automation and REST APIs, which should Your test projects should also stay structured, clean and focused on the testing,įrameworkium-examples is the example (“quick-start”) project,ĭesigned for test engineers to download and use as an example for their own tests. Time thinking about the actual tests themselves. It should mean you spend less time worrying about the plumbing, and more We’ve not thought of yet) more consistent and familiar. Java libraries to make writing tests (web, mobile app, API, other tests that ![]() While this is not ideal and I am working on seeing if there are alternative ways of solving this issue it is a workaround that we have managed to get to work.Frameworkium provides strong code structure guidelines and contains some nice Var chromeDriverWait = new WebDriverWait(chromeDriver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(20)) I then have a Before and After Scenario which configures each of my Browsers and completes the cleanup ĬhromeDriver.Manage().Window.Position = new (2192, -963) One way we solved this was to have a Given step at the start of each of our features Given I am using I believe if they were controlled by some configuration that could be applied after compiling would preferable, but I'm unclear how best to accomplish this. My final thoughts would be that the feature/gherkin files should not change to test different browsers for the great majority of cases as most features shouldn't have a browser requirement (exceptions could be newer HTML5 APIs & their fallbacks). It would still be a code change though.įollowing with the option above, the driver could be selected on a build variable ( #if IETESTING, etc), but I thought I once came across some statements claiming that these could be considered anti-patterns. I probably wouldn't have it be commented out code, but abstract it into some Setting/Factory class. Setting the driver set in a static helper and depending which you want to run, the code can be commented/uncommented ( Source). I looked into Tags and BeforeScenerio hooks, but that doesn't allow multiple browsers to be tested as the steps wouldn't be executed against each tag. ![]() The browsers can be passed in as Examples for each Scenerio ( Source), but this seems like it would bloat the Scenerio. Here are some solutions I've been able to come up with or see examples of online: My question is as the testing project grows, what is the best way to have the features run against a set of browsers? Thus far I've haven't had issues writing some "hello world" features and steps. I'm working on setting up a SpecFlow project to test a portal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |